(It’s not to say that there is a positive side of trying to hide certain funds from your partner)

I’ve been married for 10 years now and never in my life I had any money that my beloved wife didn’t know about. And guess what? I never needed to hide money from her (even despite the fact that at certain times she acted like a devoted shopaholic ). If you need someone to tell you why hiding money is a bad idea - follow me on this one:

• Hiding money is as harmful as hiding vital information; unless you’re living with a person without any self-control (including, but not limited to: badmouthing other people, portraying their partners in negative tones, envying more fortunate friends, etc), it always pays off to be open and honest. Lack of honesty automatically leads to the loss of trust - something that keeps people together. And it goes without saying that trust is something taking minutes to lose but years to rebuild (if it’s possible at all).
• Secondly: where does the hidden money go anyway? There are bad and semi-bad explanations. Let’s start with something forgiving: money is spent on entertainment like dinners with friends or gadgets or some makeup possessing close to magical beautifying qualities or jewelry or … lots of other options. The danger here is that a person does understand that s/he is doing something his/her partner won’t be happy about (especially in case of repeated expenses like this), but decides to hide money instead of being open about spending habits, wants and needs. Another example of the lack of trust or respect or both.
  • What’s worse is that your partner might use this money on damaging habits or someone else. Or considers your relationship close to its end and this builds a “war chest” to use after the divorce/separation. If this is news to you - it’s definitely worth asking.
• And the most important bit: hiding money makes family budget planning pointless. It’s quite obvious that when money is abundant, it rarely makes sense to hide a chunk of it, but in cases when money is in limited supply and it would otherwise be spent on something useful to the family (for instance, home renovations), hiding a portion of it equals postponing or canceling important jobs or purchases.

It’s all about the trust.

Do you know how big your Emergency Fund should be? You guessed it right: the size of 3+ months worth of your expenses. Or the equivalent of the unemployment rate (say, 8% unemployment means that you should have enough dough to last for 8 months) - however you look at it. But have you ever wondered: what’s the maximum allowed size of your Emergency Fund? The correct answer is 9-10 months worth of your expenses (excluding savings for financial goals). If you’re truly committed - saving even more might be a good idea, but it might as well be harmful.

Before we proceed with explanations, can you answer a simple question? How can an average Joe save up money enough for him to last for, say, 6 months? What kind of motivation drives his determination to save money rather than buy the latest plazma TV or an iPhone or a new car? Buying clothes when needed rather than a new Macy’s (David Jones, etc) catalog arrives in the mail? Staying home for holiday rather than going to Mexico/Hawaii/Fiji/you name it?

The keyword is “FEAR“. Fear of losing a job and inability to find a new one. Fear of not having enough money to pay for an emergency (from a car breakdown to an emergency hospital visit), fear of foreclosure of a recently purchased family house. Meet the economics of fear - something convincing you to spend money on various products, starting with common financial products like mortgage repayment protection to a gun in the pocket to protect you from criminals. However, the savings aspect of the economics of fear is a bit more tricky since it doesn’t force you to buy anything (except, probably for life insurance and income protection which, in my opinion, is a must-have), but does require certain changes in life priorities and expense structure.

We, Weekly Envelope users, are not fanatical supporters of the ’save yourself rich’ idea and strongly believe that scrupulous expense tracking harms you more than cures. Looks like it’s time for a piece of advice:

if you save more than necessary for a ‘rainy day’ - it has already occurred to you.

Take our word: your Emergency Fund is not the only type of financial goal you can have. There’s a huge chance that you need to save for a new car/home renovation/college for kids/your own retirement. Move the excess money to any of your financial goals. If you’ve already got everything arranged (our congratulations to you!) - give yourself a break and go on holiday somewhere or spend money on yourself by other means (ex: resort to retail therapy). Or donate the excess money to charity or to your church.

And don’t forget to tell your friends and family about the Weekly Envelope family budgeting service, which helps you without sending you on a guilt trip.

Without doubt, one of the most reliable ways to start a fight at home is accidentally saying the word ‘budget‘ (or ‘tracking income and expenses‘). At times, an innocent question like ‘Honey, how much money have we got left till the next paycheck’ could ruin your deserved family evening.

Discussions like this one take place when financial problems already exist and they’re starting becoming visible - either because the checkbook for some reason can’t be balanced, or credit card repayments doubled all of a sudden, or a UPS delivery person became your daily visitor. Anyway, families lose control over their spending and budget and try to talk their way out of “inquisitive” (but very reasonable) questions from their members. What causes such unpleasant discussions and how can families stay out of trouble?

I’ve listed several most frequently cited excuses that are used to confuse a partner and change the subject instead of stepping out of a comfort zone, admitting the financial mess and trying to find ways out.

I’m offended because you don’t believe me. (Or, Do I have to inform you about my every expense?) This is the most popular manipulative excuse (or accusation) used by both family members. The only reasonable (and as emotionless as possible) answer is: “Over the last couple weeks you’ve purchased a lot of stuff we could easily live without, and so we may need to carry some balance on a credit card this month” or “Every week you buy clothes we haven’t budgeted, so we have to gid into savings to fund your purchases”. Facts, not emotions, work best on such manipulative techniques.

Tracking expenses is so embarassing. How could we reach the rock bottom when we have to know where every penny is spent? This question is usually asked in a whining voice in response to a suggestion to define a budget and stick to it. One of the right answers is: “There are ways to avoiding counting every penny and still not spending more than a budgeted amount. Knowing how much money we’ve spent and deliberately resisting the temptation to buy stuff is way less embarassing than getting into debt without any plan to repay it”.

We earn more than we spend. Right? Why bother counting? (Also known as: We’ve never had financial problems before, so we won’t have them in the future.) However, this is likely to be a pleasant but unsustainable illusion when financial troubles are right around the corner. Again, no emotions: “We’re only relying on our home equity and credit card limits to deal with the unexpected. Last month servicing our car cost $400 more than we expected. We always hope that we’ll always have money when we need it but we don’t base this hope on anything. Starting an emergency fund will bring us some peace of mind. And let’s make a simple budget, which will tell us how much money we can safely spend without compromising our short to mid-term goals”.

Also, you need to agree on the three major rules of avoiding conflicts regarding money:

1. Both of you need to define the maximum amount you can spend per week (this amount may vary depending on your utility bills, loan repayments and other obligations). The most important element of this exercise is joint effort. The budget needs to be agreed on by both parties.
2. Both of you need to define the maximum amount each of you can spend without consulting a partner. Buying a CD for $15 might be OK but buying iRobot Roomba without talking to your partner is NOT OK.
3. Avoid lying about money. You might’ve gone a long way towards building trust, but such a simple thing like saying that your new watch costs $100 instead of $500 you’ve actually paid is capable of bringing you back square one. However, show compassion when your partner admits impulse buying instances - but be vary of the trend.

We all know the first immutable rule of personal finance: “spend less than you earn and save the rest“. Countless books reiterate this very fact over and over again. But many people find it hard to live by this rule (even while agreeing with the general concept) because they just don’t know how much money they can afford to spend. Writing down all expenses (either on a piece of paper or using a fancy software tool) helps a bit, but doesn’t answer the main question.

A Weekly Envelope approach offers a very simple yet powerful way to learn how much money a person (it works equally well on families) can spend without harming her financial position, short- and mid-term goals. Here’s how it works. Let’s have a look at a family of John and Jane Doe:

John is a computer programmer and earns $2 000 fortnightly (after tax). Jane is an accountant and brings home $1 300 fortnightly (after tax). Overall, they earn about $7 000 monthly (after tax). They live by the rule that at least 10% of their salary should be saved in an Emergency fund. This leaves them with $6 300 to spend. John created a list of regular expenses and financial obligations:

• Mortgage: $2 800 monthly
• Utilities (including electricity, cell phones, cable TV and internet, gas): $400 monthly
• Car loan: $500 monthly
• Fuel and transportation: around $300 monthly

After deducting all these expenses from their incomes, John and Jane still have $2 300 remaining. Instead of borrowing money from a credit card company (and having to repay the debt afterwards), Jane suggested setting two Financial goals:

• Trip to Hawaii next summer (planned cost: $3 500; monthly savings: $400), and
• Renovating a bathroom within the next 2 years (planned cost: $4500; monthly savings: $300)

They put this money on a reasonably high-interest savings account and will withdraw it when time comes to make a purchase. After all savings and mandatory expenses John and Jane have $1 600 left. If they spend more than this amount during the month, they will put less money into the Emergency fund, or some of their Financial Goals won’t be achieved in time. The easiest way for them to spend less than $1 600 a month is using the Weekly Envelope approach:

Divide the remaining money by 4.3 and put an equivalent amount into a plain envelope (in this case it will be $1 600 divided by 4.3, which gives approximately $370). This $370 is the maximum sum John and Jane can spend on food, entertainment, occasional coffee, clothing, etc. per week. If at the end of the week there’s some money left in the envelope, John and Jane can either spend it (without having to worry about overspending) and reward themselves for being reasonably frugal, or put it into the next week’s envelope, or put it into the Emergency fund. Similarly, if contents of the current week’s envelope weren’t enough to fund all the weekly purchases, insufficient money will come from an Emergency fund (but obviously, money will have to be put back there).

Benefits of the Weekly Envelope approach:

• Weekly planning allows always staying focused on the spending level without losing the big picture.
• Knowing how much you a person/family can spend weekly shows the current spending ability. Impulse purchases will be assessed from the ‘how much money will be left in an envelope‘ position instead of ‘we’ve still got money, right?‘.
• It becomes really easy to spot bad financial trends: if three or more weekly envelopes are overdrawn and Emergency fund gets accessed more often than once a week, this should be an early warning that spending habits should be curbed further or soft regular expenses need to be cut off.
• For better results weekly envelope can be split (in equal proportions) into daily pieces, and John and Jane won’t need to write down every small expense any more: as long as they stay within their daily limit ($370/7=$52), they can spend money on whatever they want. This saves a lot of time on tracking purchases and occasionally having debates about certain expenses.